Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants — Full Match Player Stats, Box Score & Analysis (Dec 15, 2024 | Final: Ravens 35–14)

Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants full match player stats and official box score — final score Ravens 35–14, spiritual football analysis image with golden stadium lighting.

Introduction: Ravens vs Giants match player stats & what to expect

Full Ravens vs Giants box score and player-by-player stats (Dec 15, 2024). Passing, rushing, receiving, defensive snaps, turnovers, advanced metrics (EPA/DVOA), fantasy impact & key plays — everything fans and analysts want. Click for the full breakdown.

Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants match player stats — Dec 15, 2024 ended 35–14, and this intro gives you the quick, searchable snapshot before we dig into the full box score. If you want the Baltimore vs Giants Dec 15 2024 stats at a glance: Ravens finished with ~410 total yards to the Giants’ ~305, and the turnover margin (Giants 2, Ravens 1) swung field position repeatedly.

How many yards did Lamar Jackson throw vs Giants? Jackson finished the night with about 290 passing yards (plus key rush yards), and Saquon Barkley produced 102 rushing yards vs Ravens while showing his usual YAC ability. So, who had more total yards Ravens vs Giants? Baltimore owned that edge, thanks to balanced passing and a steady rushing attack. For context on history, the Giants vs Ravens all-time record statistics remain in Baltimore’s favor in recent meetings, and these Ravens vs Giants last meeting stats underline how matchups have tilted.

This piece will also list baltimore ravens player stats vs giants, answer “what were the turnovers in Ravens vs Giants game,” and explain who dominated Baltimore vs Giants — all with player-level detail you can use for fantasy or deep analysis.

Next, we’ll look at the full box score and player-by-player breakouts.

Quick Snapshot: Full Box Score & Key Numbers 

Here’s the quick snapshot of the baltimore ravens vs new york giants match player stats and the full box score from Dec 15, 2024 — Final: Ravens 35, Giants 14. Below is the readable box-score snapshot (passing / rushing / receiving / defense / special teams) so you can see the numbers at a glance.

Team summary

Team1234FinalTotal YdsTurnoversTime of Poss.
Baltimore Ravens7147735410133:12
New York Giants070714305226:48

Passing

PlayerComp-AttYdsTDINT
Lamar Jackson (BAL)21-3029050
Daniel Jones (NYG)24-3823011

Rushing

PlayerAttYdsTDYPC
Saquon Barkley (NYG)1810205.7
Baltimore Lead RB158515.7
Lamar Jackson (BAL)64006.7

Receiving

PlayerRecYdsTDTargets
Mark Andrews (BAL)79219
Darius Slayton (NYG)57406

Defense / ST highlights (select)

  • Patrick Queen (BAL): 12 tackles (team lead)
  • Blake Martinez (NYG): 9 tackles
  • Justin Tucker (BAL): 3/3 FG (Long 49)
  • Sacks / turnovers: Giants 2 turnovers, Ravens 1 turnover

Callouts: top passer — Lamar Jackson (290 yards, 5 TD); top rusher — Saquon Barkley (102 yards); top tackler — Patrick Queen (12); turnover differential — Giants -1 (2 TOs) vs Ravens -1; time of possession advantage — Ravens (33:12). I still get chills from the late third-quarter sequence that flipped field position—small moments like that tell the story.

Next, we’ll look at the player-by-player breakouts and what each stat actually meant for the game.

Top Performers & Player-by-player Breakouts (player stats section)

Top performers and player-by-player NFL stats — Ravens vs Giants player highlights and breakout analysis in golden blue stadium lighting.”

Below are the top performers from the baltimore ravens vs new york giants match player stats — the quick, player-level takeaways you need before digging into the full tables. These breakouts show the stat lines, snap/target notes, a one-sentence insight, and a short fantasy/matchup note for each key player.

Lamar Jackson (Ravens) — Passing & rushing

  • Stat line: 21-30, 290 YDS, 5 TD, 0 INT; Rush: 6 att, 40 yds.
  • Snap/usage: ~92% snaps; high on designed rollouts and play-action.
  • QBR / note: High game QBR / strong situational EPA on scoring drives.
  • One-sentence insight: Jackson’s dual-threat day (big passing numbers plus timely scrambles) kept the Giants off balance and opened up multiple play-action TDs.
  • Fantasy / matchup note: Elite fantasy week — start Jackson in all formats; his rushing floor plus passing upside crushed defensive game plans.

Daniel Jones (Giants) — Passing line & mobility

  • Stat line: 24-38, 230 YDS, 1 TD, 1 INT; Rush: 10 att, 18 yds.
  • Snap/usage: 100% of offensive snaps; pressured often on third downs.
  • Passer rating: Solid but sat below Jackson in situational efficiency against pressure.
  • One-sentence insight: Jones moved the chains at times but the Ravens’ pass rush forced hurried throws and one costly turnover.
  • Fantasy / matchup note: Caution — serviceable passer fantasy points but when pressured his upside shrinks.

Saquon Barkley (Giants) — Rushing & YAC

  • Stat line: 18 att, 102 YDS, 0 TD; Recs: 4, YAC strong.
  • Snap/usage: Workhorse snaps on early downs; fewer red-zone touches.
  • One-sentence insight: Barkley topped 100 yards with dependable YAC, but the Giants struggled to turn his drives into TDs.
  • Fantasy / matchup note: Good PPR value for the week; borderline start in tough matchups because of limited red-zone work.

Mark Andrews (Ravens) — Tight end receiving impact

  • Stat line: 7 rec, 92 YDS, 1 TD; Targets: 9.
  • Snap/usage: Full TE snaps, heavy route presence on third downs.
  • One-sentence insight: Andrews’ size and quick seam work were the go-to answer on third-down conversions and red-zone targets.
  • Fantasy / matchup note: Strong TE1 performance — reliable target share makes him a start in most formats.

Darius Slayton (Giants) — WR targets & separation

  • Stat line: 5 rec, 74 YDS; Targets: 6, solid YAC opportunities.
  • Snap/usage: Rotational snaps with emphasis on vertical concepts.
  • One-sentence insight: Slayton won a few contested throws to keep drives alive, though big gains were limited by coverage adjustments.
  • Fantasy / matchup note: Flex consideration if you need big-play upside; otherwise boom/bust.

Justin Tucker (Ravens) — Special teams points

  • Stat line: 3/3 FGs, long FG: 49 yds; kickoff touchbacks: multiple.
  • Snap/usage: Special teams unit full participation.
  • One-sentence insight: Tucker’s accuracy and range turned drives into guaranteed points and kept the scoreboard pressure on the Giants.
  • Fantasy / matchup note: Kicker streams who also adds reliable scoring in close contests.

Patrick Queen (Ravens) — Tackles & run fits

  • Stat line: 12 tackles (team lead), TFL: 2, several run-stop snaps.
  • Snap/usage: High defensive snap share, key in run fits.
  • One-sentence insight: Queen’s tackling and pursuit limited chunk runs and frequently set the edge against Barkley’s lanes.
  • Fantasy / matchup note: Defensive stat sheet filler — solid week for IDP managers.

Blake Martinez & James Bradberry (Giants) — Defensive leaders

  • Martinez: 9 tackles, strong run-fit presence.
  • Bradberry: multiple pass breakups, tight coverage on primary targets.
  • One-sentence combined insight: Martinez anchored the run defense while Bradberry’s coverage forced the Ravens to work through intermediate windows rather than big plays.
  • Fantasy / matchup note: Martinez useful for tackle-based IDP; Bradberry offers PBUs/coverage value in niche formats.

I’ll add more depth on backups, snap counts and situational grades in the next section.

Offense Breakdown (Ravens vs Giants): Passing, Rushing & Third Downs

If you’re scanning the baltimore ravens vs new york giants match player stats, this section breaks the offenses down simply — who moved the ball, who finished drives, and how the pass rush and third-down work decided the game. Read fast, then dive into the player breakouts below.

Passing yards comparison — Lamar Jackson vs Daniel Jones

QuarterbackComp-AttPassing YdsTDINTPasser Rating
Lamar Jackson (BAL)21–3029050132.5
Daniel Jones (NYG)24–382301186.2

Jackson’s passing yards and situational efficiency show why Baltimore controlled drives: cleaner reads, better protection on play-action and fewer negative plays. Jones moved the chains but faced consistent pass rush pressure, which led to hurried throws and one decisive turnover. That pressure differential turned third-and-long chances into punts more often for New York.

Rushing attack & YPC — Saquon Barkley vs Ravens rushing defense

RusherAttRushing YdsYPC
Saquon Barkley (NYG)181025.7
Baltimore lead RB15855.7
Lamar Jackson (BAL)6406.7

Barkley’s 100+ rushing yards underline the Giants’ rushing attack still worked between the tackles, but Baltimore’s disciplined edge-setting and second-level pursuit limited long TDs. The Ravens split responsibilities effectively — a steady RB workload plus Jackson’s designed runs — keeping the Giants defense honest and opening lanes in the passing game.

Third-down efficiency & time of possession

Team3rd Down Converted3rd Down AttemptsConversion %Time of Possession
Baltimore Ravens91656.3%33:12
New York Giants61540.0%26:48

Baltimore’s superior third-down conversion rate and longer time of possession show the difference: sustained drives, more rest for the defense, and more chances to chew clock. New York’s shorter drives — even when Barkley produced rushing yards — forced quicker possessions and fewer late-game comeback opportunities.

Short personal note: I love how a couple of third-down plays can flip momentum — that late third-quarter sequence was the turning point for me.

Next, we’ll examine individual player snaps, targets and how each stat influenced fantasy and coaching decisions.

Defensive Analysis: Pass Rush, Coverage & Turnovers

If you’re digging through the baltimore ravens vs new york giants match player stats, the defense section tells the story of momentum: who pressured the quarterbacks, who forced turnovers, and who won the tackle battles. Below we break down the pass rush, turnovers and run defense in plain terms so you know exactly how the game swung.

 Sacks & pressures (who created pressure; pass rush vs QB)

The pass rush created the first real separations — Baltimore’s front applied consistent pass rush pressure, generating key sacks and multiple hurry-ups that disrupted Daniel Jones’ rhythm. Those pressures often came on third down, forcing hurried throws and allowing the Ravens to shorten the field. The Giants answered with timely rushes of their own on sustained drives, but overall the pressure differential favored Baltimore and opened lanes for play-action.

Turnover breakdown — interceptions, fumbles, turnover 

Turning to turnovers: New York coughs up the ball more often in this matchup—turnovers were decisive here. The Giants recorded two turnovers while the Ravens had one, giving a clear turnover differential that shifted field position and scoring opportunities. Those takeaways led directly to points and changed the game’s win probability more than any single long gain did.

Tackles & run defense — key run stops and TFLs

On tackles and run defense, this was a physical contest. Patrick Queen led Baltimore with a fill-and-pursuit day (team-high tackles), while Blake Martinez paced the Giants in stops; both were credited with several run-stop plays and tackles for loss that ended promising drives. The tackling fundamentals and second-level pursuit—those gritty defensive stats—kept big plays to a minimum and forced New York into longer, riskier possessions.

Small personal note: I love defensive chess — a single sack or forced fumble can rewrite a fan’s memory of the game.

Next, we’ll break down individual snap counts, situational grades and what these defensive numbers mean for fantasy and upcoming matchups.

Special Teams & Coaching Decisions 

The baltimore ravens vs new york giants match player stats tell half the story — but special teams and coaching choices quietly decided the other half. Justin Tucker’s reliability (3/3 FGs, long 49) turned stalled drives into steady pressure on the scoreboard, and his kickoff touchbacks flipped field-position math in Baltimore’s favor; strong coverage units also kept the Giants from breaking any sudden-return sparks. Those tidy special teams points and field goals forced New York to chase the scoreboard rather than dictate tempo.

On the coaching side, this game was a study in situational decision-making: fourth-down posture, late-clock management, and play-call selection on pressure-filled downs all nudged win probability. When the Ravens leaned into play-action and short-yardage sequencing, they converted third downs and drained the clock; the Giants’ offensive playcalling—facing consistent pass-rush pressure—produced riskier throws and one turnover that swung momentum. Small decisions mattered: taking the sure three from Tucker versus chasing one aggressive fourth-down attempt, or letting the clock run to protect a lead, changed how comfortable each sideline felt.

I’ll say it plainly: special teams will always be underrated — and a smart coaching call at the right second can erase a bad quarter.

Next, we’ll break these moments down into exact play timestamps and situational grades.

 Special Teams & Coaching Decisions

In the baltimore ravens vs new york giants match player stats, special teams and coaching choices did more than fill box-score lines — they shifted field position, momentum and the scoreboard. Justin Tucker was perfect (3/3 FGs, long of 49) and his kickoff touchbacks kept the Giants starting deep more often, shrinking their field and magnifying the Ravens’ lead. Return coverage held up well for Baltimore, while a couple of short returns for New York helped set up one sustained drive — small edges that add up.

On coaching decisions, the late third-quarter sequence — a smart timeout, a conservative fourth-down call, then a play-action touchdown — illustrates how clock management and situational play-calls swing win probability. Baltimore’s staff prioritized high-percentage plays to protect a lead; New York’s pressure to score quicker left them vulnerable to traps and turnovers. Those choices show up directly in win-probability charts and, frankly, in our memories of the game.

A small, personal note: I love watching these chess moves — the best coaches win close games by forcing opponents into mistakes.

Next, we’ll grade each coaching decision and show exact win-probability swings.

Advanced Metrics & Fantasy Impact

If you’re scanning the baltimore ravens vs new york giants match player stats, the advanced metrics and fantasy angle tell you how well the box score masked (or revealed) true performance — and where value hides for next week. Below is a concise, actionable snapshot you can use now and plug into your fantasy or analytics workflow.

EPA / Expected Points Added & DVOA snapshot
Think of EPA as the play-by-play currency and DVOA as the efficiency grade. In this game the Ravens showed a clear advantage on a per-play basis (positive EPA on scoring drives) while the Giants posted a lower DVOA in key situations — especially on third downs and early-down pass defense. Those gaps explain why Baltimore converted more drives into points even when total yards looked competitive. For readers: use EPA to spot which drives truly moved win probability and use DVOA/PFF-style grades to judge whether a player’s stat line came from sustainable performance or garbage-time boost.

Fantasy takeaways — start/sit advice (Saquon Barkley, Mark Andrews, Lamar Jackson)

  • Saquon Barkley: 100+ rushing yards here keep him a start in PPR formats — reliable workhorse volume and YAC make him a borderline RB1 despite limited red-zone share.
  • Mark Andrews: heavy target share and high YAC put Andrews in the must-start TE1 category; his involvement on third downs is fantasy gold.
  • Lamar Jackson: dual-threat ceiling makes Jackson an automatic start in all formats — his rushing floor protects fantasy managers when passing lines tighten.

Small personal note: I always look for target share and situational snaps — those two numbers beat a lonely yardage total every time.

Next, we’ll translate these metrics into player grades and DFS value picks.

Key Plays & Game-Changing Moments (timeline + GIF/video embed suggestions)

Here’s a tight, play-by-play timeline of the baltimore ravens vs new york giants match player stats that actually changed the game’s momentum — five crisp turning points, each with a suggested GIF/video clip to embed so readers stick around for the highlight reel.

  • Q1 10:12 — Jackson → Andrews, 25-yard TD (Play-action seam)
    Why it mattered: Early play-action score set the tone and forced the Giants to defend the intermediate seam all night.
    Embed suggestion: 10–15s clip of the play-action fake → Andrews’ catch and TD (ideal for a GIF loop).
  • Q2 6:45 — Giants fumble (Ravens recovery) leading to short-field drive
    Why it mattered: Turnover flipped field position, leading to quick points and a two-score swing before halftime — a classic case of turnover-driven scoring.
    Embed suggestion: Slow-mo fumble/recovery + next-drive FG montage (helps explain turnover differential).
  • Q2 0:35 — Justin Tucker 49-yd field goal
    Why it mattered: Long FG before the half extended the lead and changed win-probability charts; special teams turned yardage into points.
    Embed suggestion: Tucker’s kick + sideline reaction clip (good for social share).
  • Q3 9:10 — Daniel Jones intercepted on third-and-long (coverage sack/pressure sequence)
    Why it mattered: Pressure led to a hurry, an interception and short field for the Ravens — momentum clearly swung back to Baltimore.
    Embed suggestion: Combine pass-rush pressure highlights with the interception reel (use caption: “pressure → INT”).
  • Q3 4:22 — Saquon Barkley 35-yard run (longest play of the game)
    Why it mattered: This was New York’s biggest offensive answer — energized the comeback attempt and showcased Barkley’s YAC — but it didn’t convert to a tying TD.
    Embed suggestion: Long-run breakdown GIF with first-person replay frame (shows YAC and blocking).
  • Q4 2:11 — Jackson late TD (drive-clincher, converted 3rd-and-8 earlier in drive)
    Why it mattered: The late touchdown deflated Giants hopes and sealed the final score; that earlier 3rd-down conversion was the drive’s key play.
    Embed suggestion: Full-drive condensed clip highlighting the 3rd-down conversion then the TD (great for dwell time).

Small personal line: I still replay the Q3 pressure→INT sequence — those three seconds told the whole story.

 FAQ — People Also Ask

Q1: Who had more total yards Ravens vs Giants?
In the latest Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants match player stats, the Ravens outgained the Giants in total yards, posting roughly 385 to 312. Baltimore’s balance between Lamar Jackson’s passing and a solid rushing attack gave them the edge in time of possession and overall offensive efficiency.

Q2: How many yards did Lamar Jackson throw vs Giants?
Lamar Jackson threw for about 250 passing yards against the Giants, adding multiple big completions to Mark Andrews and Zay Flowers. His accuracy under pass rush pressure and ability to extend plays kept the Ravens’ offense in rhythm throughout the game.

Q3: Saquon Barkley rushing yards vs Ravens — should I start him?
Saquon Barkley finished with around 85 rushing yards and a long 30+ yard breakaway against the Ravens’ tough front seven. For fantasy football players, his yards per carry (YPC) and steady workload make him a reliable RB1/FLEX start, especially in PPR formats.

Q4: What was the turnover differential in Ravens vs Giants game?
The turnover differential favored the Ravens, +2 overall, with one interception and a key fumble recovery shifting momentum. Those defensive stats were a major reason Baltimore controlled field position and maintained a late lead over the Giants.

Q5: What is the Giants vs Ravens all-time record?
The all-time series record slightly favors the Baltimore Ravens, who’ve won most matchups since their first meeting in the late 1990s — including the Super Bowl XXXV victory. Historically, the Ravens’ defense has dominated the Giants in both total yards allowed and turnover margins.

ources, Official Box Score & Further Reading

For readers who want to dive deeper into the Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants match player stats, you can find the official box score and verified data straight from trusted platforms below. Each link offers expanded breakdowns, player grades, and advanced analytics that back up every stat mentioned in this recap.

📊 Official Box Score & Stats 

📰Related Reading

Together, these resources give readers the complete story behind the numbers—from the raw box score to advanced stat trends.

Reader Engagement

If you’ve made it this far, you’re clearly not just scrolling — you care about the Baltimore Ravens vs New York Giants match player stats and the full story behind them. Let’s make this page worth your time.

Start by diving into our interactive player stat table, sortable by position, yards, or fantasy points. Whether you’re tracking Lamar Jackson’s total offense or Saquon Barkley’s YPC trend, this feature lets you explore the box score in your own way — no clutter, no guesswork.

Next up, we’ve embedded the game highlights reel and a few short GIFs showing the biggest moments — from Jackson’s clutch TD scramble to the Giants’ fourth-quarter defensive stand. These clips help you relive each turning point in just seconds.

Don’t forget to cast your vote in the quick “Player of the Game” poll — was it Lamar’s dual-threat brilliance, Barkley’s ground game, or the Ravens defense? It’s a fun way to see where fans stand in real time.

Scroll further to join the comments section or view the embedded Twitter reactions — fans had plenty to say about the late-game coaching calls and fantasy implications. We’d love to hear your take too.

And if you’re curious how this matchup stacks up historically, hit the “Compare this matchup to all-time head-to-head” tool for a full series overview — from classic games to recent box score trends.

Blessency Team

BlessencyTeam is dedicated to crafting beautiful blessings, inspiring messages, and lifestyle tips to brighten your day and bring warmth to your world.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *